Should Canada stand by its' citizens' is how this Referendum should be felt. The gestalt behind the Referendum of the Muslim rights in Canada is simply equal rights. Currently there are gross acts of racism towards people of color that wear a head dress out of ignorance towards those peoples. Should a man be told his way of communicating to another by his custom is just plain wrong. To deny the 'Good Samaritan Act' when the Law calls for it is sacrilege just as denying a Referendum for Muslim Rights in Canada and what that would mean towards the security of Muslims in Canada.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
1 comment:
using a fancy 25 cent word such as "Gestalt" or philosophy, only makes you feel intelligent, the reader aka myself knows categorically how ignorant you actually are
and how extensive your internet research is.
As for your beliefs on the 'Battle of Quebec" go research using the website The Canadian Encyclopedia
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/battle-of-the-plains-of-abraham gclid=CjwKCAiA_omPBhBBEiwAcg7smRE7rX3290oLbDHReHwKMPqKhefKTI8yOcrIgSj2JbCDdi2rbwbUMRoCHrYQAvD_BwE
The Battle of Quebec had nothing to do with Anti-Semitism or Jewish Rights, ergo has no correlation with current Islamic Rights in Canada at the moment. Serious Research does not include watching CNN as your only outlet for current world events, because CNN is not an actual Journalistic Organization and it has nothing to do with Canada.
Finally as you feel your compatriots in La Belle Province are such Anti-Semitic Crusaders
and how the Battle of Quebec (was about Jewish Rights. It was Not) has done so much for Jewish Rights in Canada; try researching the current Quebec Provincial Bill 21:
Bill 21
Quebec’s secularism law, commonly known as Bill 21,
was passed into law by the Quebec National Assembly on June 16, 2019.
The 18-page law contains many statements of principle declaring the province’s
commitment to secularism, or laïcité, but also fine details like imposing a dress code
on several categories of provincial civil servants, including police officers and teachers.
Article 6 of the law prohibits wearing “clothing, a symbol, jewelry, adornments,
accessories or headwear” that is connected to a religious belief or could be
“reasonably considered” as such. While the law is popular in Quebec is also hotly contested
in the province, and across Canada. Several people from religious minorities who have been
forced to choose between career ambitions and religious faith are challenging the law,
supported by advocacy groups.
Quebec's commitment to secularism, or laïcité, mirrors France's commitment to secularism, or laïcité, as in France they too passed a Secularism Law.
The French State does not favour any one religion and guarantees their peaceful co-existence in respect of the laws and principles of the Republic. In application of the secular principle, the law of 15 March 2004 prohibits all clothing or other attire displaying religious worship to be worn in schools.
This Law in France and the Province of Quebec were passed with overwhelming support,
so "Vive la France!"
To conclude your Referendum for Muslim Rights in Canada has nothing to do with the letter or the spirit of the Good Samaritan Law/Good Samaritan Act. Choosing to remain silent and not embrace the 'Gestalt' of your opinions, does not make you a bad Samaritan, or a Racists or anti Islamic.
Post a Comment